Suman Bhutiya v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Life court dismissed three writ petitions concerning Panchayati Raj Elections as infructuous because the election tenure had already concluded.
What the court decided
(1 of 2) [CW-108/2016]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 108/2016
Suman Bhutiya
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4435/2015
Bhanwar Kanwar
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 196/2016
Mohini Kanwar
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.D. Chitlangi
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order
16/02/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in the Court, for the safety of all concerned.
(2 of 2)
[CW-108/2016]
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matters pertained to Panchayati Raj Election, whereas the tenure itself has come to an end.
On such submission, the present writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petitions regarding Panchayati Raj Elections filed after the tenure ended are maintainable or infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suman Bhutiya
- petitioner
Bhanwar Kanwar
- petitioner
Mohini Kanwar
- respondent
State And Ors
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/108/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court