The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a tender committee's decision. The court held the petition became infructuous as the tenure expired and the petitioner failed to appear in court over a year.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10264/2008
Abdul Saleem Son Of Bundu Khan, 59, Subhash Market, Khetri Nagar, Jhunjhunu
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Dr. Ganesh Parihar, AAG through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
05/02/2022
(2 of 2)
[CW-10264/2008]
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Simple Kumawat /35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to non-appearance of the petitioner and expiration of the contract tenure.
Abdul Saleem
State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary Department Of Fisheries, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
Director Fisheries
Joint Director Fisheries
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
