Kaluram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Court quashed the dismissal of petitioner's first parole application on ground that it was filed before 2021 Rules came into force. Matter remanded to District Parole Advisory Committee to reconsider application under 1958 Rules within thirty days.
What did the court decide?
Adverse recommendation dated 28.07.2021 quashed; matter remanded to District Parole Advisory Committee to reconsider first parole application under 1958 Rules within thirty days.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 82/2022
Kaluram S/o Sh. Lacha Bhil, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Bhil, At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur Through His Son Kishan Lal S/o Kalu Ram, Age 24 Years, R/o Jhilwara, P.s. Charbhuja Dist. Rajsamand.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Dept. Of Home, Jaipur.
- The District Collector, Rajsamand.
- The Superintendent, Central Jail, Udaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.R. Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG (Incharge)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the first parole application filed in 2020 should be considered under the 2021 Rules or the 1958 Rules.
Whether the adverse recommendation by the District Parole Advisory Committee dismissing the first parole application is sustainable under the applicable Rules.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kaluram
- respondent
State
Coram
Sandeep Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLW/82/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court