Ramavtar @ Papu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court considered a writ petition by a convict seeking waiver of the surety condition for regular parole, citing poor finances, though records showed agricultural land ownership.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on forty days regular parole with one surety (₹50,000) and personal bond (₹1,00,000).
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 47/2022
Ramavtar @ Papu, S/o Manglaram, B/c Jat, R/o Nalpura, P.s. Khetadi, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Through Secretary, Home Jaipur.
- Collector, Bikaner.
- Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : By post. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG (Incharge)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's prayer to be released on parole purely on a personal bond without furnishing sureties can be accepted given his financial status.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramavtar @ Papu
- respondent
State
- respondent
Collector, Bikaner
- respondent
Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLW/47/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court