Petitioner sought permanent parole pending before the Parole Advisory Committee. The High Court directed the Committee to decide on the parole application within two months and disposed of the writ petition.
Directed the Parole Advisory Committee to decide the petitioner's application for permanent parole within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 644/2022
Vinod S/o Shri Sohan Pal, Aged About 37 Years, At Present Lodged In Special Central Jail Saylawas, Dausa Through His Wife Smt. Seema W/o Shri Vinod, Age About 33 Years, R/o Jhuki Jhopri, 13-G Block, Salamband, P.s. Jahangirpuri, New Delhi.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. R. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment / Order
19/10/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLW-644/2022]
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
ARTI SHARMA /8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to permanent parole under the relevant prison rules.
Vinod S/o Shri Sohan Pal
State Of Rajasthan, Dept Of Home, Rajasthan Jaipur
The Director General ( Jails), Jaipur
The District Collector, Dausa
The Supp. Special Central Jail, Saylawas, Dausa
Pankaj Bhandari
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
