Allowed

Tej Singh S/O Sardar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Feb 2022CRLW/1695/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jaipur allowed a writ petition seeking first parole for the accused, Tej Singh, confined for seven years. The court quashed the rejection and directed release for 20 days upon furnishing personal bonds and surety.

What did the court decide?

First regular parole allowed for twenty days; Parole Advisory Committee recommendation quashed; Jail Authority directed to release petitioner on furnishing bonds of Rs.50,000 with one surety.

Tej Singh S/O Sardar Singh Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1695/2021

¶3

Tej Singh S/o Sardar Singh, R/o Karnaliya, P.s. Gangdhar, District Jhalawar Through His Wife Surat Bai W/o Tej Singh R/o Karnaliya P.s. Gangdhar, District Jhalawar. ( Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through I.g. Prison Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶7

The Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner.

¶8

The District Collector, Jhalawar ( Rajasthan)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Ms. Rekha Madnani, Addl. Govt. Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

25/02/2022

¶14

Petitioner has preferred this writ petition (parole) seeking first parole for twenty days.

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the report of the Social Welfare Department and Jail Authorities is in favour of the petitioner. The only ground for rejecting his parole application is the report of the Superintendent of Police, wherein it is mentioned that in addition to the present case, there are other two cases against the present petitioner.

¶16

Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the writ parole. It is contended that the report of the Superintendent of Police mentions about petitioner having two other cases, hence

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLW-1695/2021]

¶19

the Parole Advisory Committee has not committed any error in rejecting the parole application.

¶20

We have considered the contentions.

¶21

Taking note of the fact that the petitioner has remained in confinement for a period of about seven years including remission, the report of the social welfare department and Jail Authorities is in favour of the petitioner, hence, we deem it proper to allow the writ petition (parole) for a period of twenty days.

¶22

Consequently, the writ petition (parole) stands allowed. The recommendation of the Parole Advisory Committee dated 03.09.2021 qua the present petitioner is quashed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on first regular parole for a period of twenty days, on furnishing his personal bonds of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Authorities with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself before the Jail Authority on expiry of twenty days and shall maintain peace and tranquility during parole period.

¶23

In case of failure to surrender by petitioner on stipulated date, the Jail Authority shall proceed in accordance with law.

¶24

A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Authorities as well as the petitioner through Jail Authority for compliance.

¶25

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶26

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶27

ARTI SHARMA /26

Tej Singh S/O Sardar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tej Singh S/O Sardar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Chartered Gold Financial Services Private Limited

Income Tax Officer, WARD-1, Court Campus, Ajmer Road, Beawar Vs Archana Jain D/O Noratmal Padawat

Income Tax Officer Vs Porwal Yuvak Sangh

Ramesh Kumar S/O Harish Chand through His Father Harish Chand S/O Shri Dhana Ram (as He Is in J.C.) Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Das S/O Shri Devan Das Vs State of Rajasthan

Shodan Singh S/O Raj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan