Allowed

Umesh Kumar Sharma S/O Satyanarayan Sharma v. Pawan Kumar Verma S/O Shri Madan Lal Verma

Rajasthan HC3 Jan 2022CRLTP/27/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Bench allowed the High Court order transferring the petitioner from Section 138 NI Act jurisdiction to Section 407 IPC trial under Section 2 High Court Act and censured the lower court for not following the comprehensive High Court single forum procedure.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to appear at the Subordinate Court designated for Section 407 cases.

Umesh Kumar Sharma S/O Satyanarayan Sharma Vs Pawan Kumar… — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Transfer Petition No.

¶3

27/2020

¶4

Umesh Kumar Sharma S/o Satyanarayan Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o House No. 1686, Shyam Nath Tiwadi Ki Gali, Opp. Amar Jain Hospital Chaura Rasta, Jaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Pawan Kumar Verma S/o Shri Madan Lal Verma, R/o Mangal Colony, Shrimadhopur Sikar At Present Plot No. 128, Dcm Doctors Colony, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) :

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

03/01/2022

¶13

bl vkns'k ds tfj, ifjoknh@;kph dh vksj izLrqr vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 407 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶14

lquk x;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶15

t;iqj egkuxj U;k;{ks= dk nks Hkkxksa esa foHkDr gksus ls iwoZ ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn varxZr /kkjk 138 ,uvkbZ-,DV ds ekeys esa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; fof'k"B egkuxj eftLVªsV] ¼,u-vkbZ-,DV dslst½ dze&15] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk fnukad 6-3-2020 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k Fkk] ftlds fo:) vihy vfHk;qDr@v;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr djus ij t;iqj

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLTP-27/2020]

¶17

egkuxj] izFke U;k;{ks= ds v/khu lapkfyr U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj] izFke ds U;k;ky; esa vihy la[;k&10@20 iou dqekj cuke mes'k dqekj yafcr gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj] f}rh; ds U;k;ky; esa yafcr gksuk crk;k x;k gS] ftls ewyr% ,d gh U;k;ky; esa varfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k gSA vU; tfVyrkvksa vkSj igyqvksa ij tk, fcuk ;g lehphu gS fd ,d gh fu.kZ; ds fo:) izLrqr vihy o fuxjkuh ;kfpdk ,d gh U;k;ky; }kjk fuLrkfjr dh tkosA

¶18

ifj.kker% ifjoknh@;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr varj.k izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj f}rh; ds U;k;ky; esa yafcr vkijkf/kd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 35@2020 ¼lhvkbZ,l ua463@20½ mes'k dqekj cuke iou dqekj dks mDr U;k;ky; ls izR;kg`r dj fof/kuqlkj lquokbZ o fuLrkfjr djus gsrq U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj izFke ds U;k;ky; esa varfjr fd;k tkrk gSA rnuqlkj LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh fuLrkfjr gksrk gSA

¶19

U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj f}rh; vkxkeh is'kh ij nksukas i{kksa dks lwfpr dj ;g izdj.k U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj izFke esa mijksDr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa varfjr djsaxsA

¶20

vkns'k dh izfr mDr nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa dks izsf"kr gksA

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

Murari Sharma/6

Umesh Kumar Sharma S/O Satyanarayan Sharma v. Pawan Kumar Verma S/O Shri Madan Lal Verma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Kumar Sharma S/O Satyanarayan Sharma v. Pawan Kumar Verma S/O Shri Madan Lal Verma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Shimbhudayal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishambhar Dayal Vs State of Rajasthan through P.P.

Kanhaiya Lal Silawat Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Mukesh Kumar S/O Mohan Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Shyam Sunder S/O Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Palasiya S/O Ratan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan