Partly allowed

Mukesh Kumar S/O Mohan Lal Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jan 2022CRLTP/16/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court held that Section 407 CrPC does not apply where conflicting views exist between Sessions Court and Chief Judicial Magistrate on the same offence. The court decided the case in status quo and remanded it for final decision by the Sessions Court.

What did the court decide?

Case declared fit for trial before Chief Judicial Magistrate; ordered to dispose of matter in status quo; remitted to Sessions Court.

Mukesh Kumar S/O Mohan Lal Yadav Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Transfer Petition No.

¶3

16/2021

¶4

Mukesh Kumar S/o Mohan Lal Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ghinoi, Kaladera, Jaipur Rural (Raj)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶8

Virendra @ Vijendra S/o Mohan Lal Raiger, R/o Ward No. 10, Raiger Mohalla, Kaladera, Jaipur Rural (Raj)

¶9

Mahendra @ Vicky S/o Mohan Lal Raiger, R/o Ward No. 10, Raiger Mohalla, Kaladera, Jaipur Rural (Raj)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kuma Khandal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

03/01/2022

¶15

/kkjk 407 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vkosnu ij fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph rFkk fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dh cgl lquh x;hA v;kph la[;k&2 o 3 ij uksfVl rkehy ugha gq, gS] ysfdu mudh vuqifLFkfr esa Hkh izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶16

;kph }kjk gLrxr vkosnu is'k dj tkfgj fd;k x;k fd ,d gh ?kVuk ds laca/k esa ifjoknh }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk dkykMsjk

¶17

(2 of 3) [CRLTP-16/2021]

¶18

esa ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 103@18 ntZ djk;h x;h Fkh ftlesa /kkjk 323] 341] 325 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds rgr vkjksi i= U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] pkSew ftyk t;iqj esa izLrqr gqvk tgka fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 325@18 yafcr gSA fojks/kh i{kdkj }kjk Hkh ,d izFkelwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 101@18 blh ?kVuk ds laca/k esa iqfyl Fkkuk dkykMsjk esa ntZ djok;h x;h Fkh] ftlesa /kkjk 341] 323 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vykok /kkjk 3¼1½¼,l½] 3¼1½¼,Q½ ,l-lh-@,l-Vh- ,DV dk ekeyk ik;s tkus ls vkjksi i= fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k ¼vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr vR;kpkj fuokj.k izdj.k½ t;iqj esa fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 135@18 ntZ gksdj yafcr gSA

¶19

gLrxr vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 407 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk izLrqr dj tkfgj fd;k fd ,d gh ?kVuk ds l a ca/k esa ntZ dzksl dsl dk fopkj.k ,d gh U;k;ky; }kjk fd;k tkuk visf{kr gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] pkSew ds U;k;ky; esa yafcr izdj.k dks fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k ¼vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr vR;kpkj fuokj.k izdj.k½ t;iqj ds U;k;ky; esa varfjr fd;k tkosA

¶20

pwafd ;kph dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij ntZ ekeyk ls'ku U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; ugha gS] ijarq blds ckotwn /kkjk 323 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr lacaf/kr eftLVªsV U;k;ky; mfpr ik;s tkus ij izdj.k dks ls'ku U;k;ky; esa mikfiZr dj ldrk gSA mijksDr nksuksa izdj.k ,d gh ?kVuk ls lacaf/kr gS vFkok ugha] izdj.k dks ls'ku U;k;ky; vFkok fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k ¼vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr vR;kpkj fuokj.k izdj.k½ ds U;k;ky; esa dfeV fd;k tkuk mfpr gS vFkok ugha] bl laca/k esa

¶21

(3 of 3)

¶22

[CRLTP-16/2021]

¶23

lacaf/kr eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk gh vius foosdkf/kdkj dk iz;ksx fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶24

vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 407 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

¶25

izkFkhZ }kjk ;fn lacaf/kr eftLVªsV U;k;ky; ds le{k /kkjk 323 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr vkosnu izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks fo}ku eftLVªsV U;k;ky; ;FkklaHko nks ekg esa lHkh i{kksa dks lqudj mfpr vkns'k ikfjr djsxkA blh funsZ'k ds lkFk ;g vkosnu [kkfjt dj izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA rn~uqlkj LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶26

vkns'k dh izfr mDr nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa dks izsf"kr gksA

¶27

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶28

Murari Lal Sharma /8

Mukesh Kumar S/O Mohan Lal Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar S/O Mohan Lal Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Shimbhudayal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishambhar Dayal Vs State of Rajasthan through P.P.

Kanhaiya Lal Silawat Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Umesh Kumar Sharma S/O Satyanarayan Sharma Vs Pawan Kumar Verma S/O Shri Madan Lal Verma

Shyam Sunder S/O Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Palasiya S/O Ratan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan