The High Court considered Section 138 NI Act proceedings initiated by petitioners against respondents. The court allowed the revision petition.
Quashing of criminal proceedings initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 958/2022
M/s Karan Export, Through Proprietor / Authorized Signatory Shyam Pandey S/o Sh. Krishna Kumar Pandey, Address Plot No. 30, Pandey House Opp Hawamahal Badi Chopad, Jaipur And Shopkeepar Mu. Mu. Mi, Near Jyotirao Phole College, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur Raj
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar,PP Mr. Lav Kumar Bansal
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
20/09/2022
v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V egkuxj eftLVªsV] ¼,u vkbZ ,DV izdj.k½ dze&16] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k &2202@2015 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 21-08-2018] ftlds rgr v;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, Ng ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 2]17]000@& :i;s dk vFkZn.M vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &1386@2018 v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k Øe la[;k&5 t;iqj egkuxj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 15-03-2019 ls [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
nksuksa i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izdV fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vijk/k esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA ewy
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-958/2022]
jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC/k gS rFkk bl U;k;ky; ds iwoZ vkns'k fnukad 09-09-2022 dh ikyuk esa vknsf'kr dkWLV dh jkf'k tek djk;s tkus ds i'pkr~ jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½ }kjk fnukad 16-09-2022 dks jkthukek lR;kfir fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; o v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dze'k% fnukafdr 21-08-2018 ,oa 15-03-2019 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA lkFk gh] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= o vU; izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
Ajay Kumar Singhal /106
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is attracted in the present facts.
Whether the High Court should exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Karan Export, Through Proprietor / Authorized Signatory Shyam Pandey S/o Sh. Krishna Kumar Pandey
1. Yogesh Soni S/o Sh. Uttam Chand Swarnkar
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
