This criminal revision petition challenged the conviction and sentencing of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court set aside the judgment below and acquitted the accused.
Acquittal of the petitioner and quashing of the conviction and sentencing order dated 20/09/2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1255/2022
Ramavtar S/o Sharwan, R/o Village Dabich , Post Dabich, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Ratnawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Mr. Arpit Srivastava
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
20/09/2022
v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ,oa U;kf;d eftLVªsV] Qkxh] ftyk t;iqj }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k &160@15 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 4-12-2017] ftlds rgr v;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 2]00]000@& :i;s dk izfrdj vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &12@2018 ¼26@2017½ v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; vfrfjDr lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] nwnw] ftyk t;iqj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 4 vDVwcj] 2021 ls fujLr dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
nksuksa i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izdV fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vijk/k esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA ewy jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC?k gS rFkk bl U;k;ky; ds iwoZ vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vknsf'kr dksLV dh jkf'k tek djk;s tkus ds i'pkr~ jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½ }kjk jkthukek lR;kfir fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr%
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-1255/2022]
bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; o v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dze'k% fnukafdr 4-12-2017 ,oa 4-10-2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA lkFk gh] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= o vU; izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /5
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition against the conviction and sentencing order should be allowed in view of the courts' findings.
Whether the lower courts' order upholding the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be modified.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramavtar S/o Sharwan
State Of Rajasthan
Raju Lal S/o Gopi Lal
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
