Disposed

Omveer Singh S/O Dayaram v. State of Rajasthan

Revision by way of cr.ри – deprivation of liberty – compensation – order under IPC 506

Rajasthan HC14 Feb 2022CRLR/87/2022

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed the criminal revision. The Court quashed the FIR filing despite a prosecution consent, held that reconciliation/violation by the petitioner under IPC 506 is not sufficient to make a case out a criminal proceeding. Thus no cognizable offence is made out.

What did the court decide?

Firing quashed; case remanded to lower court for further proceedings per decision.

Omveer Singh S/O Dayaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 87/2022

¶3

Omveer Singh S/o Dayaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Ajan, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶7

Chandra Prakash Sho Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Fauzdar For : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

14/02/2022

¶13

;kph&vfHk;qDr vkseohj flag ¼vkxs ^^vfHk;qDr^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g nkafMd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e izdj.k ¼ls'ku izdj.k½] Hkjriqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 47@2020 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 18-10-2021 ,oa 20-10-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 8@29 ,uMhih,l ds vkjksi yxkrs gq, mDr vijk/k esa vkjksi lquk;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr ¼2021½ 4 ,llhlh 1 rksQuflag

¶15

(2 of 4) [CRLR-87/2022]

¶16

cuke rfeyukMw jkT; rFkk ¼2021½ fdzfeuy ykW fjiksVZj ,l-lh1791 latho vxzoky cuke Hkkjr la?k esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj iqfyl vf/kdkjh dks lg&vfHk;qDr }kjk iqfyl vfHkj{kk esa nh x;h bfRryk vFkok /kkjk 67 ,uMhih,l] 1985 ds rgr fd;s x;s dFku lk{; esa xzkg~; ugha gS] blds ckotwn gLrxr izdj.k esa lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd dh dfFkr izdVdkjh bfRryk ,oa iwNrkN uksV ds vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dk vkjksi fojfpr fd;k x;k gS tks fof/k&lEer ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd bl izdj.k esa blh vk/kkj ij lg&vfHk;qDr ljnkjflag ds ekeys esa igys fojfpr vkjksi dks vikLr djrs gq, ekeyk izfrizsf"kr fd;k gS rFkk iqu% vkjksi fojfpr gksus ij blh U;k;ky; }kjk mls mUeksfpr fd;k x;k gSA vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk Hkh lg&vfHk;qDr ljnkjflag us fHkUu ugha gSA vr% fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj djrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd lg&vfHk;qDr ljnkjflag ls bl vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk fHkUu gSA cjkenxh ls iwoZ nksuksa i{kksa dh eksckbZy ij ckr gqbZ gSa rFkk Lokid vkS"kf/k inkFkZ Hkh vkseohj ls [kjhn fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd vkjksi dh LVst ij lk{; dk lw{erk ls fo'ys"k.k o foospu fd;k tkuk vuqKs; ugha gS] vUr esa vk{ksfir vkns'k fof/k&lEer crkrs gq, ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶19

gLrxr ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd fnukad 27-12-19 dks lg&vfHk;qDr jkeckcw rFkk v'kksd ds ckMs dh ryk'kh esa 121 fdxzk xkatk cjken gqvk tks fd okf.kfT;d ek=k ls vf/kd FkkA

¶20

(3 of 4) [CRLR-87/2022]

¶21

jkeckcw dks mlh le; ekSds ls fxjQrkj fd;k x;k rFkk v'kksd dh fxjQrkjh ckn esa gks ik;hA

¶22

mijksDr U;kf;d n"VkUr rksQu flag cuke rfeyukMw jkT; rFkk latho vxzoky cuke Hkkjr la?k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS fd iwNrkN uksV vFkok iqfyl vfHkj{kk esa nh x;h bfRryk dh laLohdfr vfHk;qDr vFkok lg&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) lk{; esa xzkg~; ugha gS] ysfdu gLrxr ekeys esa bl vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ;g vkjksi vuqla/kku ds nkSjku izdV gqvk gS fd mDr xkatk vkseohj ls [kjhnk x;k rFkk lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd us ;g bfRryk nh gS fd mlds eksckbZy uEcj 9119158807 o 9079935496 ls vkseohj ds eksckbZy uEcj 7062630460 ij ckrphr o lkSnsckth gqbZ FkhA ,d vU; eksckbZy uEcj Hkh crk;s x;s gS] fdUrq og v/kwjk jgk gSA vfHk;qDr v'kksd dh bfRryk rFkk iwNrkN uksV ds laca/k esa tks laLohd`fr vk;h gS] og lk{; esa xzkg~; ugha gSA vr% ek= mlds vk/kkj ij vkjksi fojfpr fd;k tkuk fof/k&vuqdwy ugha gS] ysfdu dfFkr dkWy&fMVsy ds vk/kkj ij dksbZ iqf"Vdkjd lkexzh gks rks mlds vk/kkj ij vkjksi fojfpr gks ldrs gSa] ysfdu vk{ksfir vkns'k esa mijksDr eksckbZy uEcj vfHk;qDr }kjk mi;ksx esa fy;s x;s gksa] ,slk Li"V mYys[k ugha gSA blds vfrfjDr rFkkdfFkr eksckbZy uEcj fdlds }kjk mi;ksx eas fy;s x;s] fle fdlds uke tkjh gqbZa vkfn ds laca/k esa dksbZ rF; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gS] rFkkdfFkr dkWy fMVsy Hkh bl U;k;ky; esa miyC/k ugha gSA

¶23

mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa Li"V gS fd vk{ksfir vkns'k rF; vkSj fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i ugha gSA bl izdkj ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj ekeyk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

(4 of 4) [CRLR-87/2022]

¶25

vr% vfHk;qDr vkseohj dh vksj ls izLrqr nkafMd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj mldh lhek rd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 18-10-2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa ekeyk izfrizsf"kr dj fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mijksDr U;kf;d n`"VkUr rksQu flag cuke rfeyukMw jkT; ,oa latho vxzoky cuke Hkkjr la?k esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ,oa dfFkr eksckbZy uEcj fdl vfHk;qDr }kjk mi;ksx esa fy;s x;s] mudh dkWy fMVsy ,oa fle fdlds uke tkjh gqbZ] vkfn ds laca/k esa fopkj djus ds ckn fof/k&vuqlkj u;s fljs ls vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr djus vFkok vkjksi eqDr djus vkfn ds laca/k esa vius foosdkuqlkj vkns'k ikfjr djsA

¶26

vfHk;qDr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k yafcr izdj.k esa vkxkeh rkjh[k is'kh ij O;fDr'k% vko';d :i ls mifLFkr jgsaA

¶27

izLrqr ;kfpdk mDr izdkj ls fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS rFkk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶28

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶29

Mittal/54

Omveer Singh S/O Dayaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omveer Singh S/O Dayaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tofik S/O Samad Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Meena S/O Shri Gopal Urf Ramgopal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Gajanand Son of Bheemsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jay Narayan Saini Son of Shri Har Sahay, Vs State of Rajasthan

Khajan Singh S/O Shri Ompal Singh Vs Himmat Singh Yadav S/O Shri Sheyoram Singh Yadav

Shubra Yadav W/O Navin Yadav D/O Rajesh Yadav B/C Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan