Jay Narayan Saini Son of Shri Har Sahay, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Feb 2022CRLR/628/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this School Certificate case, the High Court of Rajasthan examined whether the accused juvenile was a minor at the time of the offence. The Court noted that while the certificate dated 02-04-2004 stated she was 16 years old then, making her a minor, the current age is now 19, making her an adult. The Court modified the imposed sentence accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The JS Board was directed to pronounce judgment bar обращаясь к несовершеннолетнему.

Jay Narayan Saini Son of Shri Har Sahay, Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 628/2021

¶3

Jay Narayan Saini Son Of Shri Har Sahay, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Garh, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Kumari Neelam Daughter Of Ramkishor, Age About 15 Years 7 Months 20 Days, Resident Of Gadh, Police Station Sikandara, District Dausa, Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meera Devi Wife Of Ramkishore, Resident Of Gadh, Police Station Sikandara, District Dausa (Raj.)

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma For : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Buddhi Prakash Sharma.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

14/02/2022

¶13

fo}ku fo'ks"k U;k;ky;] ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e 2012 rFkk ckyd vf/kdkj laj{k.k vk;ksx vf/kfu;e] 2005 nkSlk ftyk nkSlk }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 02-3-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk is”k dh x;h gS ftlds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k esa izlaKku fy;k x;kA

¶14

(2 of 4)

¶15

[CRLR-628/2021]

¶16

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) izlaKku ysus ckcr dksbZ i;kZIr lkexzh i=koyh ij ugha gS rFkk fcuk dksbZ dkj.k nf'kZr fd;s lh/ks gh fxjQ~rkjh okj.V ls ryc fd;k gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;k tkosA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vk{ksfir vkns”k dks fof/k&lEer gksuk crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

lquk x;k] izLrqr rdksaZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶19

izdj.k esa 15 o"khZ; ihfMrk us fnukad 21-11-19 dks vius ppsjs HkkbZ ds fo:) ;g vkjksi yxk;k gS fd og [ksr esa vdsyh Fkh rc vfHk;qDr us ekSds ij vkdj mlds lkFk tcnZLrh dk iz;kl fd;k] itkes dk ukMk [kksydj mlds xqIrkax ds vxz Hkkx ij gkFk Qsjus yxk rFkk Lruks dks nckus yxk fQj mldh cgu fdj.k vk x;h rks vfHk;qDr Hkkx x;kA bl ekeys esa iqfyl us ckn vuqla/kku vafre izfrosnu udkjkRed :i ls izLrqr fd;kA ifjoknh dh vksj ls fojks/k ;kfpdk izLrqr gksus ds ckn izdj.k esa 200 o 202 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr c;ku ys[kc) fd;s x;s rFkk var esa vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 02-3-21 ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 354 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 7@8 iksDlksa vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi esa izlaKku fy;k x;kA

¶20

ihfMrk us viuh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dh iqf"V /kkjk 161 o 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa dh gSA ihfMrk dh cgu fdj.k dk Hkh dFku gS fd og ekSds ij igqaph rks vfHk;qDr mls ns[kdj Hkkx x;kA vadrkfydk ds vuqlkj

¶21

(3 of 4) [CRLR-628/2021]

¶22

ihfMrk dh tUefrfFk fnukad 02-4-2004 gS] vr% ?kVuk ds le; ihfMrk vo;Ld FkhA nksuksa i{kksa ds chp jaft'k pyus dk rF; Hkh vk;k gS ysfdu izlaKku dh LVst ij ;g cpko cgqr lqlaxr ugha gSA fopkj.k ds nkSjku vfHk;qDr i{k mfpr izdze ij vius cpko ys ldrk gSA izFken`"V;k vfHk;qDr ds fo:) mijksDr vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa izlaKku fy;s tkus ckcr i;kZIr lkexzh jgh gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vk{ksfir vkns'k bl lhek rd rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gSA

¶23

tgka rd vfHk;qDRk ds fo:) fxjQrkjh okj.V tkjh djus dk iz'u gS] ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2007¼12½ ,l lh lh 1 bUnj eksgu xksLokeh cuke mRrjkpay jkT; ds ekeys esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh gS fd lkekU; :i ls izFke pj.k esa leu vFkok vf/kdre tekur okj.V tkjh fd;k tkuk pkfg,A tgka vijk/k xaHkhj izdfr dk gks rFkk lk{; foyksfir djus ;k vfHk;qDr ds fxjQ~rkjh okj.V ls cpus vkfn ds xaHkhj vkjksi gks rks dkj.k nf'kZr djrs gq, gh fxjQ~rkjh okj.V tkjh fd;k tkuk pkfg,A ,sls dksbZ dkj.k vk{ksfir vkns'k esa ugha gS rFkk U;k;ky; ds le{k Hkh ,slh dksbZ lkexzh miyC/k ugha FkhA vijk/k dh izdfr] vafre izfrosnu udjkRed :i ls izLrqr gksus rFkk rRi'pkr U;k;ky; }kjk izlaKku fy;s tkus vkfn laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fxjQrkjh okj.V ds ctk; tekurh okj.V tkjh gksuk visf{kr Fkk] vr% bl lhek rd vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr dj tkjh'kqnk fxjQ~rkjh okj.V dks 5]000@&:i;s ds tekurh okj.V esa ifjofrZr fd;k tkrk gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; bl fcUnq ij mijksDr funsZ'kksa dh rRdky ikyuk djsaA

¶24

(4 of 4) [CRLR-628/2021]

¶25

ifj.kker% ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk mijksDrkuqlkj vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) tkjh'kqnk fxjQ~rkjh okj.V dks 5]000@&:i;s ds tekurh okj.V esa ifjofrZr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

Murari/70

Jay Narayan Saini Son of Shri Har Sahay, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jay Narayan Saini Son of Shri Har Sahay, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tofik S/O Samad Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Meena S/O Shri Gopal Urf Ramgopal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Gajanand Son of Bheemsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Omveer Singh S/O Dayaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Khajan Singh S/O Shri Ompal Singh Vs Himmat Singh Yadav S/O Shri Sheyoram Singh Yadav

Shubra Yadav W/O Navin Yadav D/O Rajesh Yadav B/C Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan