Disposed

Pawan Kumar and Anr. v. State

Rajasthan HC15 Nov 2022CRLR/813/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this S.B. Criminal Revision Petition, the High Court of Rajasthan disposed of the matter upon information of a compromise between parties, noting that the protection under Sections 4 and 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act was already in operation for the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners disposed; possession of premises directed to remain with petitioners; pending applications disposed.

Pawan Kumar and Anr. Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 813/2004

Pawan Kumar And Anr

----Petitioner

Versus

State

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 812/2004

¶11

Pawan Kumar And Anr

¶12

----Petitioner Versus

¶13

State

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Suresh Kumbhat.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Salim Khan Mehar, PP. Mr. Jitendra Gang.

¶16

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶17

Order

¶18

15/11/2022

¶19

Learned counsel for the parties submit that a compromise has happened between the parties.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the benefit of the Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act is already operating in favour of the petitioners.

¶21

Since the benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act is already operating in favour of the petitioners, therefore, the present petitions are disposed of as no further adjudication is

¶22

(2 of 2)

¶23

[CRLR-813/2004]

¶24

required, as the protection of Sections 4 and 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act has already been given to the petitioners.

¶25

Further, it is directed that the possession of the premises in question shall continue to remain with the petitioners, to which, the respondent-complainant does not have any objection.

¶26

All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶28

95-/Jitender/Suraj/-

Pawan Kumar and Anr. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar and Anr. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Giri Vs State

Megha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Kumar and Anr. Vs Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti

State of Rajasthan Vs Dinesh Chandra Mathur

Smt Mayapati @ Dholi Vs State and Anr.

State of Rajasthan Vs Gopa Ram @ Gopalram