Single bench dismissed S.B. Cr. Rev. Petition No. 334/2000. The High Court held that the impugned order, which relied on Section 197 CrPC safeguards without refutation, did not deserve interference and dismissed the petition and pending applications.
Petition dismissed; all pending applications stood dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CRLR-334/2000]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 334/2000
Taj Mohd
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA Mr. SG Ojha for respondent no.2, 4 & 5
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order
01/07/2022
The revision petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed on behalf of the petitioner that this revision petition may kindly be allowed and the order dated 15.04.2000 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Merta in Criminal Revision No.34/99 be declared illegal and be quashed.”
The impugned order has been apparently passed by putting the safeguard under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C. and there is no refutal of the fact that such safeguard was not applicable in the present case.
In light of the limited aspect, the order impugned does not deserve any interference. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. All pending application also stand dismissed accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
62-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an impugned order does not deserve interference when the safeguard under Section 197 of the CrPC was put while there is no refutation of such safeguard not being applicable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Taj Mohd
State And Ors
Pushendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
