Mohan Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court observed that the appellant had expired. Accordingly, the criminal appeal was dismissed as having abated.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as abated due to the death of the appellant.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 265/1996
Mohan Lal
----Appellant
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. SG Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
01/07/2022
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has expired.
Thus, the present appeal is dismissed as having become abated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohan Lal
- respondent
State
Coram
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/265/1996
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court