Dismissed

Mohanram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Mar 2022CRLMP/736/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged an FIR under Section 482 CrPC alleging it was vindictive. The court permitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file representation and evidence, subsequently dismissing the petition as withdrawn and disposing of the stay application.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of petition with liberty to file representation and evidence; stay application disposed of.

Mohanram Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 736/2022

¶3

Mohanram S/o Sh. Lichhamanram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural(Raj.)

¶4

Gajendra S/o Sh. Baburam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶5

Ghanshyam S/o Sh. Baburam, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶6

Siyaram S/o Sh. Mohanram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶7

Ganapat S/o Sh. Mohanram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶8

Tilaram S/o Sh. Mohanram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶9

Renvatram S/o Sh. Mohanram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶10

Shravanram S/o Sh. Mohanram, Aged About 25 Years, R/ o Birsalu, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶11

----Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Deenaram S/o Sh. Bhomaram, R/o Kapuriya, Mantoda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.) , Presently Residing At Chindari Hal Kapuriya, Khedpa, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶14

Ashok Bhadu S/o Sh. Babulal, R/o Village Kapuriya, Tehsil Bapini, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.)

¶15

		----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Aidan Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. S.K.Bhati,PP

¶16

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶17

Order

¶18

05/03/2022

¶19

By way of the present petition under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioner has challenged the F.I.R. No. 172/2021 dated 21.12.2021 registered at P.S. Matoda, District

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMP-736/2022]

¶22

Jodhpur on the ground that the same has been lodged vindictively.

¶23

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Aidan Choudhary, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to put forth his defence by way of representation along with documentary and other evidence before the Investigating Officer.

¶24

In case such evidence is produced, the Investigating Officer shall consider the same, in accordance with law.

¶25

The present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶26

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶27

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶28

211-Akansha/-

Mohanram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohanram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.K. Construction Company Vs Balaji Makan Samagri Stores

Kanwar Raj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Padmaram Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Jyoti Babu Vs State of Rajasthan

Surjo Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan