The High Court quashed the first information report alleging a dowry demand and subsequent proceedings based on the parties having reached a compromise and agreeing to live separately after an eleven-year dispute.
The FIR dated 12.06.2010 and all proceedings emanating therefrom pending in the Court were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1051/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. PankajArora |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP |
| Mr. Surendra Singh |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
05/03/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1051/2022]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
230-Amar/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR alleging dowry demand should be quashed in view of the parties entering a compromise and deciding to live separately.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jyoti Babu S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal
Vishesh Arora S/o Shri Jyoti Babu
Smt. Arti Kapoor W/o Shri Dharmesh Kapoor
Smt. Neeta Arora @ Munni Devi Arora W/o Shri Kailash Narayan Arora
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Saroj Arora W/o Shri Jyoti Babu
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
