This High Court of Rajasthan quashed an FIR registered for cheating and forgery offences under Section 482 CrPC. The court considered a compromise reached between the parties and the complaint nature being essentially commercial.
The petitioners were granted relief by quashing the impugned FIR No.137/2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 65/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
(2 of 3)
[CRLMP-65/2022]
Santo Ka Vas Village Pawa Teh. Sumerpur, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Ripudaman Singh : Mr. S.K. Bhati, Public Prosecutor Mr. Surendra Singh for complainant
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
17/08/2022
(3 of 3)
[CRLMP-65/2022]
submits that the complainant will have no objection if the impugned FIR is quashed on the basis of the compromise.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
226-Ramesh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned FIR should be quashed in light of the compromise between the parties and the nature of the dispute being commercial.
Whether the relief claimed by the petitioners is supportable in light of Section 482 CrPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Referred¶34
[(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.Referred¶34
[AIR 1992 SC 604] · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ramesh Vaishnav S/o Lt. Tarachand
Manish Bhati S/o Gulab Ram Bhati
Mukkar Ali S/o Kasam Khan Ji
Abdul Hamild S/o Taj Mohd.
Rajendra Kumar S/o Fularam Ji
Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Fularam
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
