The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition challenging a trial Court order taking cognizance for forgery offences related to a forged marksheet in an election contest. Finding no merit and noting delay, the writ petition failed.
The writ petition and the stay petition were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 348/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Bharadwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, Public Prosecutor
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
17/08/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-348/2022]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
227-Ramesh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial Court's order taking cognizance for forgery offences in an election dispute despite delay.
Whether the writ petition challenging the order dated 21.05.2018 is maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kala W/o Shri Iqbal Husain
Iqbal Husain S/o Shri Mohd. Subhan
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Sushila Devi W/o Shri Mohan Lal Vishnoi
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
