Disposed

Madhu Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2022CRLMP/638/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court directed the petitioners to approach the Station House Officer with representations regarding alleged life threats. The Court instructed the SHO to analyze the threat perceptions and issue necessary security orders if required, clarifying that the order does not affect any ongoing proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to appear before SHO with representation for grievance hearing and security assessment.

Madhu Kanwar Vs State of Rajasthan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 638/2021

¶3

Madhu Kanwar W/o Shri Om Prakash D/o Shri Mohan Singh Ji, Aged About 25 Years, 485, Shastri Nagar, Pali, District Pali, At Present Residing At 11, Sipahiyo Ka Bas, Pali, District Pali.

¶4

Om Prakash S/o Mahendra Kumarji, Aged About 27 Years, 11, Sipahiyo Ka Bas, Pali, District Pali.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Pali.

¶9

The Station House Officer, Marwar Junction, District Pali.

¶10

Narayan Singh Sisodiya S/o Shri Madhu Singh Sisodiya, Janta Colony, Basant Vihar, Pali.

¶11

Sonu Kanwar W/o Virendra Singh, Basani, Dhadhavariya, Jaitaran City, District Pali.

¶12

Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Mohan Singh, Indra Colony, Shastri Nagar, Pali.

¶13

Ganpat Singh S/o Hukam Singh, Marwar Junction, Pali.

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramdeen Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP

¶16

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶17

Order

¶18

02/09/2022

¶19

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMP-638/2021]

¶22

grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶24

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Marwar Junction, District Pali alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station Marwar Junction, District Pali shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶25

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶26

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶27

71-Zeeshan

Madhu Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Chandra Vs State

Chuna Ram @ Chundas Vs State of Rajasthan

Khetaram Vs State

Heer Singh Solanki Vs State of Rajasthan

Radhey Shyam Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpat Ram Vs State