Disposed

Subhash Chandra v. State

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2022CRLMP/1762/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneouspetition concerning alleged caste atrocities, the court disposed of the petition after being informed by the Public Prosecutor that no offence under the SC/ST Act was made out. The trial was allowed to proceed on IPC charges with liberty to petitioners to pursue remaining issues, directing the investigating officer to continue under Section 41A Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to raise issues at trial; investigating officer to proceed u/s 41A Cr.P.C.

Subhash Chandra Vs State — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1762/2020

¶3

Subhash Chandra S/o Shri Radhkrishan Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, Pareek Colony, Ward No. 33, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶4

Gopal Ram S/o Shri Raja Ram Verma, Aged About 50 Years, Pareek Colony, Ward No. 33, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶5

Sumitra Devi W/o Shri Gopal Ram, Aged About 42 Years, Pareek Colony, Ward No. 33, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶6

Radha Devi W/o Shri Radhakrishan Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, Pareek Colony, Ward No. 33, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶7

Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Roop Chand Khemnani, Aged About 40 Years, Indra Colony, Ward No. 31, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State, Through P.p.

¶11

Smt. Manoj Devi W/o Shri Kalu Ram Meghwal, Ward No. 33 Gali No. 2, Pareek Colony, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

¶12

		----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Om Prakash for Mr. Rakesh Matoria
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Arun Kumar, PP Mr. Mohd. Rashid Mr. Ratan Lal, A.S.I., Hanumangarh Town	P.S.

¶13

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶14

Order

¶15

01/09/2022

¶16

At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor submits that the offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has not

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-1762/2020]

¶19

been found to be made out, only offence under Section 341, 323, 34 IPC has been found to be made out against the petitioners. He also submits that the conclusion as ready to be file before the learned trial court.

¶20

The factual report furnished by learned Public Prosecutor is taken on record.

¶21

On such submission, the present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to take up all the issues before the learned trial court at appropriate stage. It is made clear that the investigating officer in rest of the proceedings shall proceed in accordance with Section 41A Cr.P.C.

¶22

All pending applications stand disposed of.

¶23

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶24

131-Zeeshan

Subhash Chandra v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Chandra v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal Krishan Vs State

Chhog Singh and Ors. Vs State and Anr.

Chuna Ram @ Chundas Vs State of Rajasthan

Khetaram Vs State

Lahari Aameta Vs State