Kailash Chand Sharma and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of Crl. Mps as infructuous since the trial court acquitted the petitioners. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
High Court disposed of Crl. Mps as infructuous since the trial court acquitted the petitioners. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 585/2015
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4810/2014 Saroj Parashar Wife of Ramsu Parashar, D/o Shri Bholashankar Sharma, Resident of House NO.4546, RK Colony, Near Pani Ki Tanki, Bhilwara Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. J.S. Rathore, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. Mr. Ramniwas, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP Mr. Veerendra Singh, Adv. on behalf |
| of Mr. Ashwani Chobisa, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
14/10/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-585/2015]
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that trial court had acquitted the petitioners. So, these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
All the pending applications also stand disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /51-52
Kailash Chand Sharma
Arpit Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Pratibha
Narendra Singh Dhadha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court