The court held that the petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition is infructuous and ordered accordingly without engaging in detailed reasoning.
None; declared infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2366/2015
Sanjay Jagariya
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan And Anr
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav, AAG, Mr. Yogesh Singhal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
14/10/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this criminal miscellaneous petition has become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Seema/20
Sanjay Jagariya
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
