Partly allowed

Ruchika Solanki v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Aug 2022CRLMP/5078/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and a stay petition. It directed the petitioner to approach the Station House Officer with representation to evaluate security threats, noting that observations would not affect criminal proceedings against her.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to approach SHO with representation; SHO to evaluate threat and provide security if necessitated. Stay petition disposed of.

Ruchika Solanki Vs State of Rajasthan — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5078/2022

¶3

Ruchika Solanki D/o Shri Kanti Lal Solanki, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jhanda Vali Vas Chavni Shivganj The-Shivganj Distt. Sirohi Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Deptt. Of Home Affairs Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur

¶7

The Superintendent Of Police, Sirohi

¶8

S.h.o., Ps Barloot Dist. Sirohi

¶9

Kurum Luniwal S/o Virendra Luniwal, Caste Bunkar R/o Jhelam Apartment Pratap Nagar Jaipur

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Arun Kumar,PP

¶12

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶13

Order

¶14

22/08/2022

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioner on the ground that she is facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶17

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-5078/2022]

¶20

petition with the direction to the petitioner to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Barloot, District Sirohi alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station Barloot, District Sirohi shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioner, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to

¶21

the petitioner.

¶22

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioner.

¶23

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶24

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶25

308-Sudheer/-

Ruchika Solanki v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruchika Solanki v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhura Lal Vs State

Murlidhar Vs State

Satish Patel Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranu Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Vs State of Rajasthan

Keshar Mal and Ors. Vs State and Anr.