The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking to quash an FIR under Section 384 IPC. The court held that the allegations required investigation and could not be quashed merely on the plea of false implication.
The petition and stay application seeking quashing of the FIR were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4457/2022
Dilip Kumar S/o Manak Chand Ji, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 1399 Main Bazar, Sojat Road, District Pali (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vasudeo Charan |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mool Singh Bhati,P. P. |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
12/10/2022
(DINESH MEHTA),J
42-A.Arora/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered under Section 384 IPC can be quashed on the plea of false implication.
Whether investigation is necessary for the given allegations.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dilip Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Justice Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
