Shera Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed the bail application as infructuous because a prior petition under Section 482 CrPC allowing bail had already been allowed in 2017.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous due to prior allowance of petition under Section 482 CrPC.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11405/2014
Sheraram S/o Pusaram Jat, R/o Village Datina, Tehsil Khivsar, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan through the Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. VinayKothari |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati,Public Prosecutor |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
11/10/2022
- In view of the fact that applicant's petition (S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.655/2014) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been allowed vide order dated 29.06.2017, Mr. Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present bail application has been rendered infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sheraram S/o Pusaram Jat
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan through the Public Prosecutor
Coram
DINESH MEHTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/11405/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court