The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution as neither counsel appeared physically nor via video conferencing, and the petition had been pending since 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 298/2015
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
----Complainant-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhedia, Public Prosecutor Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA Order
20/07/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners neither appeared physically nor connected through video conferencing, even in second round and the petition has been pending since 2015.
Hence, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Ashish Kumar /51
Harlal Singh and others
State of Rajasthan through PP
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
