The petitioner sought to maintain a criminal miscellaneous petition. The court held that the petition had become infructuous and dismissed it without engaging with substantive legal arguments or precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1918/2020
Himmat Singh@sohan Singh S/o Ranjeet Singh, aged about 23 years, R/o Brajpura, Post Bobadi, Ps Manoharpur, Distt. Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Mahawar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP Mr. Harendra Singh for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
21/07/2022
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition has become infructuous.
Hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
PAYAL/3
Himmat Singh@sohan Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur
SHO, Ps Manohapur
Dhava Ram
CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
