Section 145 (1) of the Cr.P.C., the learned SDM, Pokran had not passed any order under Section 146 (1) of the Cr.P.C. and no such finding or observations were made therein despite that the SHO Pokran proceeded to attach the property for which neither he was directed nor he was having any power to attach the same in accordance with the procedure established by law. It seems that the SHO, Pokran has acted in an arbitrary manner. When the application was moved for releasing the property, the learned SDM, Pokran did not apply its judicial mind and rejected the prayer for releasing the property from attachment in a very fanciful manner. When the order was challenged before the revisional Court even the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Pokran, in a very capricious manner, rejected the revision while ignoring the factual and legal aspects of the matter. The approach of the learned SDM, Pokran as well as learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Pokran cannot be appreciated, rather this Court feels deep aversion to the manner in which the orders have been passed by the Courts below as the same is bad in the eyes of law.
