Partly allowed

Hanuman Jakhar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Nov 2022CRLMP/1213/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of three connected criminal miscellaneous petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIRs. Noting that prima facie the offence is made out, the High Court dismissed the petitions but granted liberty to the petitioners to submit bail bonds at the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal misc. petitions for quashing of FIR dismissed; liberty granted to petitioners to submit bail bonds before trial court at charging stage.

Hanuman Jakhar Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1562/2021

¶3

Madan Lal S/o Sh. Bhera Ram, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Luhara, Teh. Bidasar Dist. Churu.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Vodafone Idea Ltd., 5Th Floor, Gaurav Tower, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Through Authorized Signatory. ----Respondentspondentsondents

¶7

Connected With

¶8

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 477/2021

¶9

Devi Singh Khediya S/o Sh. Ram Singh Jat, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Dhandheru, P.s. Bidasar, Dist. Churu. ----Petitioner

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Vodafone Idea Ltd., 5Th Floor, Gaurav Tower, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Through Authorized Signatory.

¶12

----Respondentspondentsondents

¶13

----Petitioner Versus

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1213/2021

¶16

Hanuman Jakhar S/o Shri Surja Ram, Aged About 38 Years, Tehandesar, Tehsil Bidasar, District Churu.

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Vodofone Idea Ltd., 5Th Floor, Gaurav Tower, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Through Authorized Signatory.

¶20

----Respondents

¶21

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki – PP Mr. Vipin Mankad for complainant

¶22

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶23

Order

¶24

15/11/2022

¶25

The present criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR

¶26

(2 of 2)

¶27

[CRLMP-1562/2021]

¶28

No. 31/2019 registered at Police Station Bidasar, District Churu for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.

¶29

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that prima facie the offence has been found to be made out against the petitioners.

¶30

In the given factual matrix, the present criminal misc. petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit their requisite bail bonds before the learned trial court at the time of filing of the charge-sheet and the date of filing of the chargesheet shall be informed by the Investigating Officer to the petitioners; in case they fail to do so, the learned trial court shall be free to proceed strictly in accordance with law. Further, the petitioners shall also have a liberty to take up all their issues before the learned trial court at appropriate stage.

¶31

The stay applications also stand disposed of.

¶32

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶33

200to202-AK Chouhan/-

Hanuman Jakhar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanuman Jakhar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanuwant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhapu Vishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Nena Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Devi Singh Khediya Vs State of Rajasthan

Jyoti Bairwa Vs State