No substantive legal principle deducible from an order granting permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition, resulting in its dismissal.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted and the petition stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 112/2020
Paras Bafna S/o Shri Nemichand, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Jain, R/o Pal Ice Factory, Near Thar Dry Port, Pal, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Learned P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Shivnath Singh Rajpurohit |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. SK Bhati,PP |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
22/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the present petition.
Permission granted.
The present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
93-pooja/-
Paras Bafna
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
