Asharam v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order rejecting bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a murder case, where conflicting statements from witnesses were highlighted but no opinion on merits expressed.
What did the court decide?
Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. rejected.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 972/2022 Asharam S/o Shri Hinduda, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sarkot, Police Station Salamgarh, District Pratapgarh. (At Present Lodged in District Jail, Pratapgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA Order
23/02/2022
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with the F.I.R. No.181/2021 registered at Police Station Salamgarh, Pratapgarh for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to an accused charged with murder under Section 302 IPC in view of conflicting natural and eye-witness statements.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Asharam S/o Shri Hinduda
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/972/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court