Bail application allowed for petitioners, two women accused of offences under Section 498-A IPC and Section 406 IPC. High Court observed absence of antagonism between petitioners and assured resignation to police.
Bail allowed; protected from summons and arrest; restrictions on leaving station unless with permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9447/2022
----Petitioners
Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prajot H. Jaggi Mr. Anoop Agarwal For : Mr. Sanjeev Mehla, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
14/10/2022
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= efgyk iqfyl Fkkuk&/kkSyiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&53@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 498,] 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-9447/2022]
fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] os ifjokfn;k ds lkl o uun gSa] ifjokfn;k vius llqjky ek= ,d fnu jgh gS] yxk;s x;s vkjksi feF;k gSa] vdkj.k fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks muds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjokfn;k us fuosnu fd;k vijk/k xaHkhj gS rFkk L=h/ku Hkh cjken fd;k tkuk gS] vUr esa vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
ifjokfn;k ds ifr ls gLrxr vfHk;qDrx.k dk ekeyk fHkUu gS] nksuksa efgyk,a gSa] vr% izLrqr rdksZ] ekeys ds rF;ksa vkfn dks ns[krs g q ,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k 1- eerk lkeUr iRuh jkts'k rFkk 2- eqLdku jkts'k lkeUr iq=h jkts'k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh@Fkkukf/kdkjh efgyk iqfyl Fkkuk&/kkSyiqj dks funsZ'k fn;s tkrs gSa fd muds ;gkWa iathc) mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZx.k dks fxjQ~rkj fd;s tkus dh lwjr esa ;fn izkFkhZx.k muds larks"kizn ,d&,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s jkf'k dh nks tekursa izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mUgsa fuEu 'krkZas ds v/khu tekur ij vktkn dj fn;k tk, %
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9447/2022]
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /120
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application in a case involving Section 498-A IPC and dowry harassment should be allowed.
Whether the bail application, dated 15/01/2022, withdrawn by FIR on 15/01/2022, merits granting bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mamta Samant
Muskan Rajesh Samant
State Of Rajasthan
Umashanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
