The High Court of Rajasthan rejected bail applications under Section 12(2)(a)(ii) Cr.P.C. noting the presence of rape accusations and familial injury, and issued conditions directed at the victims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh for Mr.Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar mahala, PP Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain & Mr. Dilip Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
13/10/2022
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk&xsUMksyh ftyk cwUnh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 83@2021 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 o 120&ch Hkk-na-la- esa fxj¶rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze
(2 of 4)
[CRLMB-3826/2022]
tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDx.k funksZ"k gSaA vly vuqca/k ftldk dwVjfpr gksuk crk;k gS] vfHkys[k ij miyC/k ugha gSA dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh }kjk vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk o vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk crkrs gq, vkosnu [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k rFkk ;g Hkh tkfgj fd;k fd rhuksa vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 nizla ds rgr ;kfpdk izLrqr djrs le; mijksDr nLrkost dks rS;kj fd, tkus ds rF; dks Lohdkj fd;k gSA vr% vfxze tekur dk vkosnu [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
ifjoknh fnus'k dh vksj ls ntZ djokbZ xbZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,oa vuqla/kku ds vuqlkj ;g vkjksi gSa fd ifjoknh dh ekSlh dh csVh fueZyk dh d`f"k Hkwfe ds lEcU/k esa mfeZyk ds i{k esa Tokjs dk'r ds lEcU/k esa ,d dwVjfpr bdjkjukek rS;kj fd;k ftl ij fueZyk vkfn ds gLrk{kj dwVjfpr fd, rFkk ;g nLrkost mUgsa OgkV~lvi ij izkIr gqvkA vfHk;qDr dqynhi o v'kksd bl nLrkost ij xokg gSaA mfeZyk ds lEcU/k esa tkfgj fd;k x;k gS fd mls dwVjpuk dh dksbZ tkudkjh ugha gS rFkk Lo;a mlds lkFk /kks[kk&/kM+h gqbZ gSA
(3 of 4)
[CRLMB-3826/2022]
mDr nLrkost dh cjkenxh o vuqla/kku vkfn gksuk 'ks"k gS ysfdu mfeZyk ds efgyk gksus o mlds fo:) yxk, x, vkjksiksa dks ns[krs gq, mls vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr gSA
ifj.kker% izkfFkZ;k@vfHk;qDrk mfeZyk ckbZ iRuh gsejkt dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh@Fkkukf/kdkjh] iqfyl Fkkuk] xsUMksyh ftyk cwUnh dks funsZ'k fn;s tkrs gSa fd muds ;gkWa iathc) mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izkfFkZ;k@ vfHk;qDrk dks fxj¶rkj fd;s tkus dh lwjr esa ;fn izkfFkZ;k muds larks"kizn ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s jkf'k dh nks tekursa izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls fuEu 'krkZas ds v/khu tekur ij vktkn dj fn;k tk, %
tgka rd vU; izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dqynhi ,oa v'kksd dh vfxze tekur dk iz'u gS rks mDr vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksiksa dh xaHkhjrk rFkk muls vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk] izLrqr rdksZa ,oa izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
(4 of 4)
[CRLMB-3826/2022]
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dqynhi ,oa v'kksd dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL/82
Urmila Bai W/o Hemraj
Ashok S/o Satyanarayan
Kuldeep Meena S/o Giriraj
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
