Allowed

Satyanarayan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Jul 2022CRLMB/9300/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed bail applications preferred by two accused persons facing trial for IPC offences triable by a Magistrate. The court granted bail without expressing an opinion on merits, directing release upon execution of personal bonds and furnishing sureties to appear for trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail with personal bonds in Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Satyanarayan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9300/2022

¶3

Satyanarayan S/o Jaychand, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Hindu Luhar R/o Chungi Naka Ladnun Road Sujangarh Ps Kotwali Sujangarh Dist. Churu At Present Ward No. 01 Jaswantgarh Dist. Nagaur (Presently Lodged At Sub Jail Deedwana Dist. Nagaur)

¶4

Mukhatyar Aslam S/o Gani, Aged About 48 Years, B/c Teli Musalman R/o Ward No.01 Near Idgah Jaswantgarh Dist. Nagaur (Presently Lodged At Sub Jail Deedwana Dist. Nagaur)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. I.R. Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. A.R. Choudhary,PP.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order

¶12

15/07/2022

¶13

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.61/2022 of Police Station Jaswantgarh, District Nagaur, for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-9300/2022]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Satyanarayan S/o Jaychand & (2) Mukhatyar Aslam S/o Gani, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.61/2022 of Police Station Jaswantgarh, District Nagaur provided they execute personal bonds in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶21

50-Ishan/-

Satyanarayan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyanarayan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faheem Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Chandra Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Kana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bheru Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalulal Soni Vs State of Rajasthan

Satyanarayan Vs State of Rajasthan