Allowed

Kana Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Jul 2022CRLMB/9285/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application for offences under Sections 384 and 306, the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur, without expressing opinion on merits, deemed it just and proper to grant bail to an elderly petitioner released on bond with sureties pending the long trial pending challan stage.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in connection with FIR No.103/2022 on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each prior to trial court.

Kana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9285/2022

¶3

Kana Ram S/o Kishna Ram, Aged About 84 Years, R/o Vill. Kayastha Basni Tehsil Deedwana Dist. Nagour (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Deedwana)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. B.R Chahar
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for complainant.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶9

Order

¶10

14/07/2022

¶11

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 103/2022 of Police Station Deedwana, District Nagaur, for the offence punishable under Section 384 and 306. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The first bail application was dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh after filing of the challan vide order dated 04.07.2022.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the challan has already been presented and there is no evidence against the petitioner for abetment to commit suicide. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-9285/2022]

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶17

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Kana Ram S/o Kishna Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.103/2022 of Police Station Deedwana, District Nagaur, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶18

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶19

137-Ishan/-

Kana Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kana Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish @ Goriya Vs State of Rajasthan

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Kanta Sharda

Munaf Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Pusaram Vs State

Lal Chand Vs State

Teju Vs State