Allowed

Dinesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Jul 2022CRLMB/9102/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur allowed two separate bail applications filed by accused persons for offences under IPC and Arms Act. The Court granted bail subject to the condition of executing a personal bond with adequate sureties to ensure appearance in court.

What did the court decide?

Both petitioners released on bail subject to executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9102/2022

¶3

Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Nyavada Ps Bagoda Dist. Jalore Raj. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail Barmer)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6829/2022

¶10

Ganesh @ Vikky S/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Nohar, Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh. (Lodged In District Jail, Barmer)

¶11

	----Petitioner Versus
State, Through Pp	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Surendra Bagmalani Mr. B.Ray. Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶13

Order

¶14

13/07/2022

¶15

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.100/2022 of Police Station Sadar Barmer, District Barmer for the offences punishable under Sections 332, 353, 307 IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. They have preferred these two separate bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioners submit that the no one got injured in this case and challan of the case has already been

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-9102/2022]

¶19

presented and no investigation is pending. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, both the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Babulal & (2) Ganesh @ Vikky S/o Ashok Kumar shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.100/2022 of Police Station Sadar Barmer, District Barmer provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶22

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶23

115-116 MS/-

Dinesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banwari Lal Vs State

Sunny Vs State

M/S. Shore Products Limited Vs R.S.I.D.and I.C.Ltd.Riico and Anr.

Shriram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pukh Raj Jajda Vs the Union of India

Pappu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan