Sunny v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second application for suspension of sentence. Despite the appellant serving six years, the Court held that specific allegations of dowry harassment leading to the wife's death within seven years of marriage precluded suspension.
What did the court decide?
The application for suspension of sentence is dismissed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 114/2022
Sunny S/o Shri Kalu Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Tehsil Bhadara, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Anil Bidan Halu | |
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. SK Mehar, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
12/07/2022
This is second application for suspension of sentence. The first application for suspension of sentence was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2021.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence of the appellant should be suspended considering he has served six years and pending disposal
Whether the specific allegations of harassment for dowry leading to the death of his wife are relevant for suspending sentence
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunny S/o Shri Kalu Ram
- respondent
State, Through Pp
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/114/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court