Allowed

Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/O Jay Kishan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Aug 2022CRLMB/9077/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was allowed. The High Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to furnishing a personal bond with sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/O Jay Kishan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9077/2022

¶3

Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/o Jay Kishan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Milakpur Gurjar, Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In Central - Jail, Alwar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav, GA-cum-AAG For Complainant(s) None Present

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

03/08/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 292/2022 Registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Police Bhiwadi, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 308, 327 and 395 IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 18.05.2022 and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶13

Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

¶15

petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-9077/2022]

¶18

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/o Jay Kishan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶21

Gourav/49

Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/O Jay Kishan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/O Jay Kishan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roop Chander Vs State

Faiyaj S/O Abdul Gaffar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Son of Shri Anadaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Satya Narain Vs State

Naresh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Hamid Hussain Son of Shri Ismail Vs State of Rajasthan