Allowed

Hamid Hussain Son of Shri Ismail v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Aug 2022CRLMB/6930/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner, allowing him to furnish a personal bond with sureties despite the opposition by the public prosecutor.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Hamid Hussain Son of Shri Ismail Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6930/2022

¶3

Hamid Hussain Son Of Shri Ismail, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Jotkadar Police Station Gopalgarh District Bharatpur. At Present In Sub. Jail, Deeg.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.p.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav, GA-cum-AAG

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

03/08/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 230/2021 Registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Section 306 IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 01.04.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that after investigation, offence under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC was not found proved against the petitioner and charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner under Section 306 IPC. Conclusion of trial may take long time. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail.

¶13

Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the bail application.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-6930/2022]

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Hamid Hussain Son Of Shri Ismail shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶19

Gourav/41

Hamid Hussain Son of Shri Ismail v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hamid Hussain Son of Shri Ismail v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roop Chander Vs State

Faiyaj S/O Abdul Gaffar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Son of Shri Anadaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Satya Narain Vs State

Naresh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak Dayma @ Bali S/O Jay Kishan Vs State of Rajasthan