Allowed

Jai Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Dec 2022CRLMB/8623/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding an NDPS offence, the High Court deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner after a hearing wherein the prosecution opposed the application. The court directed release against a personal bond and pay-sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.

Jai Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8623/2022

¶3

Jai Singh S/o Anna Singh Rawat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 228, Gori Dag, Bekadi Palra, P.s. Aadarsh Nagar, Ajmer (Raj.). (At Present Lodged At Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	R.K. Charan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Vikram Sharma,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

08/12/2022

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.28/2021 of Police Station Bhainsroadgarh, District Udaipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 8/15 & 25 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of recovery of contraband, present petitioner was not present and he is the registered owner of the vehicle from which the contraband was recovered. Counsel further submits that challan of the case was also presented against the petitioner for the offence under Section 8/25 of NDPS Act and there are no other criminal antecedents of the petitioner and now no investigation is pending. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-8623/2022]

¶17

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Jai Singh S/o Anna Singh Rawat, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.28/2021 of Police Station Bhainsroadgarh, District Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶19

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶20

17-raksha/-

Jai Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal Vs State

Harendra @ Harsh @ Mota Vs State of Rajasthan

Balwan Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal Vs State

Lakhan Singh @ Lakhan Banna Vs State of Rajasthan