Babulal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court accepted a report from the police indicating an FIR would be filed. Consequently, the court dismissed the pending criminal appeal on the ground of infructuousness.
What did the court decide?
Criminal appeal dismissed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 240/2022
Babulal S/o Sirdararam, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Shiv Vihar Saran Nagar Plot No. 33, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
- State, Through Pp
- Khuma Ram S/o Sh. Gigaram, B/c Meghwal, R/o 8 P 57 Kudi Bhagtasani Housing Board, P.s. Kudi Bhagtasani, Jodhpur.
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. C.L. Mali |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP |
| Mr. Rakesh Gupta |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
07/12/2022
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Babulal S/o Sirdararam
- respondent
State
- respondent
Khuma Ram S/o Sh. Gigaram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLAS/240/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court