The High Court rejected the bail application of Himmat Singh arrested for offences under IPC Sections 457, 380, and 411. The court held that twenty cases were registered against him and declined bail. It directed the trial court to expedite the trial.
Bail application rejected; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7504/2022
Himmat Singh @ Vicky S/o Sh. Ram Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 163, Navdurga Colony, Jhalamand Chouraha, P.s. Kudi Bhagtasani, Jodhpur. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sunil Bishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
23/11/2022
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.98/2022 of Police Station Kudi Bhagtasani, Jodhpur for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411 of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Per contra learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-7504/2022]
Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that as many as twenty (20) cases were registered against the present petitioner, this Court in not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. Hence, the bail application filed by the petitioner is hereby rejected.
However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
31-raksha/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the benefit of bail should be granted to the petitioner given twenty cases registered against him.
Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the trial proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Himmat Singh @ Vicky
State Of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
