Dismissed

Shambhu Rav @ Bablu Rav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Nov 2022CRLMB/7382/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding NDPS offences. The court held that due to commercial quantity contraband and implication under Section 29 NDPS, bail could not be granted but granted liberty to file afresh after the trial court records the Investigating Officer's statement.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file afresh after recording of Investigating Officer's statement. Claim for bail dismissed.

Shambhu Rav @ Bablu Rav Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7382/2022

¶3

Shambhu Rav @ Bablu Rav S/o Sh. Bhagwan Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 106, Santosh Nagar, Sangriya Fata, Bhomiya Ji Colony, Thana Basni, Dist. Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Pratap Garh).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

22/11/2022

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody since 18.05.2022 in connection with F.I.R. No.113/2021, Police Station Suhagpura, District Pratapgarh, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 29 of the NDPS Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery of contraband was made from the possession of the petitioner and he has been implicated in this case with the aid of Section 29 of NDPS Act. Challan of the case has been presented and no investigation is pending, therefore, benefit of bail should be granted to the petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-7382/2022]

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶18

The recovered contraband is commercial quantity and the accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case with the aid of Section 29 of NDPS Act, therefore, no case is made out for grant of bail to the petitioner. Hence, the instant bail application filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed.

¶19

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file afresh after recording the statement of Investigating Officer. The trial Court is directed to record the statement of Investigating Officer as early as possible.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶21

37-raksha/-

Shambhu Rav @ Bablu Rav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shambhu Rav @ Bablu Rav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tansukh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushkar Vs State of Rajasthan

Bittu Vs State of Rajasthan

Anita Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajuram Vs State

Prahalad Ram Vs State of Rajasthan