Dismissed

Vipin Kumar S/O Kaluram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Sept 2022CRLMB/7429/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail. The court held that the disclosure of identity makes it possible to arrest and that issuing bail for an active record offender involving serious offences is not proper.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; Petitioner's bail application rejected.

Vipin Kumar S/O Kaluram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 7429/2022

¶3

Vipin Kumar S/o Kaluram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o House No. 25, Mukundgarh, Police Station Mukundgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhvinder Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mehla, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

21/09/2022

¶12

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk&dksrokyh >qa>quq] ftyk&>qa>quq esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&659@2021 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls izdj.k eas feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] og bZ&fe= dk lnHkkfod :i ls lapkyu djrk gS] mlds }kjk dksbZ dwVjpuk ugha dh x;h gS] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] vdkj.k vfHk;qDr dks fxjQrkj fd;k x;k rks mlds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-7429/2022]

¶16

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk ,oa vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku esa vko';drk dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶19

gLrxr ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus ifjoknh lquhy ds Jfed dkMZ ij viuk uke ,fMV fd;k rFkk dwVjfpr Jfed dkMZ dk mi;ksx djrs gq, jkT; ljdkj ls viuh iRuh dh izlwfr ds laca/k esa izlwfr lgk;rk izkIr djus ds fy, viuh iRuh dh vkbZ-Mh- vkfn izLrqr dj vkosnu Hkh izLrqr fd;kA iqfyl }kjk mijksDr rduhfd ds ek/;e ls dh x;h dwVjpuk ds laca/k esa vfHk;qDr ls vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk crk;h gSA vfHk;qDr ds okafNr gksus ls /kkjk 37 iqfyl vf/kfu;e ds rgr U;k;ky; ls okj.V Hkh izkIr fd;k x;k gS] ekeyk /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk-na-la- rFkk 66Mh] 71 lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh la'kks/ku vf/kfu;e] 2000 ds rgr vUoh{kk/khu gSA

¶20

vr% izLrqr rdksZa ,oa izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi rFkk izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

Mittal /47

Vipin Kumar S/O Kaluram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vipin Kumar S/O Kaluram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Bharoshi Vs State

Ramotar @ Ramavtar Son of Shri Rajaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Samay Singh S/O Shreeram @ Shreeman Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Sharma S/O Pramod Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxman S/O Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sultan @ Lala S/O Hansraj Vs State of Rajasthan