Allowed

Sultan @ Lala S/O Hansraj v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Sept 2022CRLMB/14232/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for two accused charged with theft. The petitioners were ordered released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Sultan @ Lala S/O Hansraj Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

14232/2022

¶4

Sultan @ Lala S/o Hansraj, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Harijan Basti Ward No. 19, Police Station Reengus, District Sikar.(Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶5

Rahul @ Buliya S/o Rajesh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Opposite Indra Colony Stadium, Govindgarh, District Jaipur.(Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh Meratwal, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

21/09/2022

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.468/2021 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 379 of IPC.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-14232/2022]

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the same.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioners namely, 1. Sultan @ Lala S/o Hansraj 2. Rahul @ Buliya S/o Rajesh are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

Gaurav/21

Sultan @ Lala S/O Hansraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sultan @ Lala S/O Hansraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Bharoshi Vs State

Ramotar @ Ramavtar Son of Shri Rajaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Samay Singh S/O Shreeram @ Shreeman Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Sharma S/O Pramod Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxman S/O Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vipin Kumar S/O Kaluram Vs State of Rajasthan