Ganpat Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew bail application on merits but sought expedited trial direction due to custody since 03.12.2018. Court dismissed application as not pressed and directed trial court to expedite trial.
What did the court decide?
Expedition of trial by trial court directed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Third Bail Application No. 6598/2022 Ganpat Ram S/o Kahmu Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bherudi Tehsil Sedva District Barmer (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Barmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Choudhary Mr. J.K. Suthar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
22/09/2022
After attempting to argue the matter on merits for quite some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. third bail application, however, prayed that the petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2018, therefore, the trial court be directed to expedite the trial.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. third bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed. However, looking to the custody period of the petitioner, it is expected that the trial court shall expedite the trial.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail or dismiss the application when the petitioner withdraws the application on merits but seeks expedited trial due to long custody.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganpat Ram
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/6598/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court