Allowed

Deepak S/O Puran v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Feb 2022CRLMB/619/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan considered arguments regarding the petitioner's alleged wrongful implication in a case involving sexual offences against a minor. The Court noted that the victim had lodged the FIR due to a misunderstanding. Without expressing an opinion on the merits, the Court deemed it just and proper to grant bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Deepak S/O Puran Vs State of Rajasthan — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 619/2022

¶3

Deepak S/o Puran, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Basai Mev Ps Firozpur Jhirka Distt. Noohn Mewat Haryana Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP. Mr. Vishram Prajapati

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

24/02/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.369/2021 Registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 363, 366A, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, 2012.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. Petitioner is behind the bars since 22.12.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant has filed the affidavit that he has lodged an FIR due to misunderstanding. Conclusion of trial may take time.

¶13

Learned counsel for the respondent also admitted the factum of misunderstanding.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-619/2022]

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Deepak S/o Puran shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Seema/35

Deepak S/O Puran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak S/O Puran v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil S/O Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashish Sharma S/O Radhagovind Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaukin Son of Jamalu Vs State of Rajasthan

Somdutt S/O Hajarilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Meena S/O Shri Kishan Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Nidhi Sharma W/O Rajesh Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan