Allowed

Sunil S/O Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Feb 2022CRLMB/1024/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, charged with offences under Sections 363, 376 IPC and POCSO Act, had been in custody since 11.01.2022. The court noted that the prosecutrix wanted to live with the petitioner and no rape allegation was levelled in her 164 Cr.P.C. statement. Without expressing an opinion on merits, the court deemed it just to

What did the court decide?

Accused petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each each.

Sunil S/O Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash Vs State… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1024/2022

¶3

Sunil S/o Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gram Renwal Manzi Ps Phagi Distt. Jaipur (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP
For Complainant(s)	:	Mr. Virendra Singh, Adv.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

23/02/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 224/2021 Registered at Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 11.01.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the prosecutrix in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has not levelled the allegation of rape against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the prosecutrix wants to live with the petitioner and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-1024/2022]

¶15

Learned counsel for the complainant has also admitted that the prosecutrix wants to live with the petitioner.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sunil S/o Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Gourav/20

Sunil S/O Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil S/O Shri Lalaram @ Omprakash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Badgoti S/O Shri Madan Lal Badgoti Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Kumar Jain S/O Shri Babulal Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Poonam Chauhan D/O Late. Amar Singh W/O Kamal Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashish Sharma S/O Radhagovind Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaukin Son of Jamalu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mushtak Mohammad S/O Shri Shabbir Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan