The HC held a bail application infructuous as the investigation officer reported the offence under IPC 420, 376(2)(N) was not proved and intended to close the case under Adam-Vaku Jhooth provisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5468/2022
Ashok Meena Son Of Shri Narsi Lal Meena, Resident Of Village Sumel, Agra Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP For Complainant(s) : Mr. Pallav Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
04/08/2022
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the latest factual report in which Investigating Officer stated that after investigation, he has not found the offence proved under Sections 420, 376(2)(N) IPC against the petitioner and he is going to submit final report pertains to Adam-Vaku, Jhooth before the court concerned. So, this Criminal Bail Application has become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/110
Ashok Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhadha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
